Welcome to Funny Games

Play top FREE games daily
Register Now

private section

Discussion in 'Comments and suggestions' started by Havok, Oct 14, 2007.

  1. Havok

    Havok The Serious One.

    29
    0
    18
    could we please just have one section, were only certain people are allowed? (people who post for real, and not just to post crap.) have mods select who should be allowed in the section. they see how people post.
     
  2. Agentjake4

    Agentjake4 Banned

    62
    1
    18
    yeah thats a good idea. we have people posting absolute s***! We should have a section for only people hu dnt tlk lk ths al dy an wanna sve tme jst mssng 1 lttr. its so hard to read and so annoying

    also, i think there should be a section dedicated to anyone over 18s. there is a way that petr can do something so that nyone enters their ages under 18 can not access this stuff. At the moment, 8 year olds can see you talking about porn
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 2, 2007
  3. Havok

    Havok The Serious One.

    29
    0
    18
    over 18 section = about 5 people :roftl:
     
  4. Agentjake4

    Agentjake4 Banned

    62
    1
    18
    people talking about adult stuff = lots, therefore we have some dirty little teenagers round here!

    Woo 65th post
     
  5. kingjazzad12

    kingjazzad12 Banned

    183
    1
    18
    Grrr

    shut up noob same joke over and over dats my job
    When does michael jackson go to bed?
    when da big hand touches da lil hand!!!! :roftl::roftl::roftl:
     
  6. Agentjake4

    Agentjake4 Banned

    62
    1
    18
    stop double posting..i'm not the one with a dirty mind..anyone who joins this forum can see you going "Oooh werez da porn OMG i luv DBZ AnAAL BesT SXE gAme EvA!"
     
  7. bbbgscott

    bbbgscott Master of the Universe

    48
    1
    18
    those are good ideas, but they're just impractical
    I love the 18+ thread, but anyone could get in just by changing their age in their profile.

    And I'm all for seeing the banning of kingjazzad12
     
  8. bwood74

    bwood74 Defqon.1 FTW!!

    53
    0
    16
    Yeh

    SAME ERE, BUT U GOTTA THINK OF THE KIDS PARENTS THEY COULD BE BEHIND THERE KIDS BACKS LETTING THEM LOOK AND PLAY THOSE GAMES ON THE 18+ SITES.:fmad:
    :stupid:
     
  9. bbbgscott

    bbbgscott Master of the Universe

    48
    1
    18
    not likely, I bet the majority of parents don't even know that their kids are doing it
     
  10. bruce1991

    bruce1991 n00b

    1
    0
    1
    obviously you wouldn't be allowed in the 180+... neither would i lol
     
  11. Agentjake4

    Agentjake4 Banned

    62
    1
    18
    Nope, Im 12

    I had a firend who was playing 18+ Violence games which I cannot name for legal puposes at 8. His parents would let him play them all he wanted. I think nowadays, 18+ Violence games are not considered nearly as bad as 18+ nudity games which is definately wrong, but no one seems to mind people discussing 18+ gangster games but people are outraged at people talking about 18+ nudity games. Now, I'm not saying that people shouldn't be outraged at either, but I think there SHOULD be different sections, maybe locked by a quiz only adults could answer, but I think it is the parents responsibility.
     
  12. bwood74

    bwood74 Defqon.1 FTW!!

    53
    0
    16
    yeh i agree, and i like the quiz thing to. but wat qeustion could b so hard that we cant find out some how.:confused:
     
  13. Lev

    Lev Guest

    ^ One of the best posts of the week is right here. ^

    Although it would be pleasant to have a weeded-out version of the forums it simply would have very little activity, because if you haven't noticed, the forum is high % of gibberish, cutting that out would leave you with an almost dead, meaningful forum.
    I see merits in both, but right now we need activity to seed more activity, regardless of how pathetic the level of discussion might be.
     
  14. bwood74

    bwood74 Defqon.1 FTW!!

    53
    0
    16
    hey wats that got to do with da thread
     
  15. Lev

    Lev Guest

    Point and case.

    Anyway, just to humor.
    KoL is a horrible pun-filled RPG so obviously they are going to have a lot of idiotic post and spam, so they have an in-game literacy testing quest to gain access to public chat to begin with. I liked that idea, but I don't think that would work here seeing as a lot of the people who come here choose to dumb themselves down. I'm not talking about subtle little grammatical nuance, I'm talking about things like leaving the caps lock on and misspelling the simplest words the same way every time they say it.
    'Pplz hu tlk lik dis don mean dey don no how 2 spell, dey jux tlk lik dis to ______(?).'
    Replacing the with "da" is obviously intentional, and people here could talk normally if they thought normal was better, but perhaps their little inner-city school peers have taught them that pretending to have an African-American accent over text which holds no accent is cool, actually I take that back, it's not even African-American, it's just wigger streetrat slang centered around the copying of that culture, butchering, and improperly storing it to let it fester on it's own. This eventually leaks into pop culture and becomes somewhat of a standard in the places which have a populus that embraces that sort of thing, namely schools.

    Well that was my bout of immaturity right there I suppose.
    [/rant]
     
  16. bwood74

    bwood74 Defqon.1 FTW!!

    53
    0
    16
    why ppl tlk lik dis is called chat on computer talk its easyer to tlk lik dis cause easyer to do small talk.

    p.s could u try and wright littler posts plz
     
  17. Lev

    Lev Guest

    Replacing this with "dis" or the with "da" or like with "lik" or talk with "tlk" are all 1 letter difference, the avr WPM for a 2 finger typist (which I am by the way) is 27, and with 238 words and 1110 letters in there, even if you butchered every word in there by 1 letter, even the 1 letter words, it would give you (238/27 = 8.81m), 1000/238 = 4 letters per word, which means 3 letters per word would make it 25% faster to write but much longer to read (2 mins shorter to write), but in your case it would be 23 words per post making it about a min long meaning shaving about 10 seconds off the time.

    So, you can either spend another 10 seconds typing your post out correctly, or disrespect everyone reading your post, bring the forum down in general, and just plain make everyone "more stupid" by reading it.

    http://homepage.virgin.net/ljmayes.mal/baud/table.htm
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Words_per_minute
    http://www.microsoft.com/typography/ctfonts/WordRecognition.aspx
    I will try if you stop making yourself look like you wear boxing gloves when you type
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 3, 2007
  18. bwood74

    bwood74 Defqon.1 FTW!!

    53
    0
    16
    i was just making a point before. so why are you insulting me
     
  19. Lev

    Lev Guest

    Well, the last comment was meant to be playfully snarky, not insulting. The rest of the post was also making a point and was true and sited.

    The more interesting question is when the automated banning system is going to be fixed because according to what I can see on your record you shouldn't be able to post anymore... forever :confused:

    By law you are not legally able to access pornographic content under the age of 18 or 21 depending where you live, if your parents are allowing you to do this then it is an obligation of theirs to stop you from accessing it. If you are under 18, and your parent is letting you, then the best thing to do would be to simply stop accessing it, your parent should be taking care of you but for some reason is not being a very good parent, therefore the responsibility is on you. Not that I think that most of this sites younger viewers have an abundance of morals and ethics developed, especially if they are in a dysfunctional family as mentioned.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 3, 2007
  20. bbbgscott

    bbbgscott Master of the Universe

    48
    1
    18
    Lev, I think I'm in love...

    Will you have my metaphorical love child?
     

Share This Page